National Security College
 GSDM(Master degree)
 GSDM(Master degree : Part)
 Joint Staff College
 Duty Training Center
 
  Home > Academic course > National Security College > Guideline
Period : 1 year (45 weeks)
Target
Colonel/general

Fourth grade official, Grade-II-A official public official/public corporation executives

Executives of media/business
Education Method

Division?

Subject / Lecture

Lecture(472 hours)39%

KNDU professor (203.5 hours) 17%

Basic lecture (203.5 hours)

- 1 subject : Comprehension of national security etc. 5 subjects, 22.5 hours
- 2 subjects : Situation in the United States of America etc. 18 subjects, 51hours
- 3 subjects : North Korea's politics etc. 6 subjects, 18 hours
- 4 subjects : Korean mid and long term national defense policy etc. 14 subjects, 21hours
- 5 subjects : Information resources administration etc. 5 subjects, 21 hours
- 6 subjects : Outside the country inspection
- 7 subjects : United States of America research? etc. 79 subjects opening, 60hours
¡Ø 5 subjects at a time, total 10 subjects selectively attended
- 8 subjects : Treatise subject
- 9 subjects : National circumstantial judgment etc. 4 subjects, 10 hours lecture

Outside (268.5 hours) 22%

Outside specialist invitation lecture (202.5 hours)

- Korean unity policy etc. 47 subjects, 142.5 hours (each department minister, major country ambassador, Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, each military president etc.)
- Outside specialist selection subject 18 subjects opening, 60 hours? (role and influence of speech etc.)

Culture?lecture (66 hours)

- the participatory government's national vision and? propulsion strategy etc. 22 subjects, 66 hours

Small group activity
(472 hours)39%

Policy subject small group guidance/research/seminar/presentation (472 hours)

 

- In ¥°, ¥± subject Theory education about policy, plan, execution and estimation : 73 hours
- In ¥², ¥³, ¥´ subject policy-making process through practice proficiency on unsuccessful/successful policy example research and pending issue by Action-Learning techniques : 127 hours
- ¡Ø Theory/business specialist lecture ¡æ concerning researches ¡æ fieldwork ¡æ specialist invitation panel discussion ¡æ policy alternative report creation
- Other subjects : 272 hours

Panel discussion
(18 hours) 1.0%

Field specialist invitation (18 hours)

- Field specialist invitation panel discussion for policy subject solutions : 18 hours

Spot studying (111 hours)9%

Domestic(51 hours)

- For policy subject achievement connection institution/spot inspection, major country embassy, South-North road/railroad connection branch office, Panmunjeom etc. : 21 hours
- Selection subject : 15 subjects, 30 hours (energy, environment, labor, culture etc.)

International(60 hours)

- foreign country study : 60 hours

Treatise creation (150 hours) 12%

School tutor guidance differed by specific field

- Treatise ground guidance : 30 hours
- Treatise creation : 60 hours
- Treatise examination : 60 hours

Evaluation Element
Busywork

Evaluation item

Ratio(%)

Note

Small group

research

Individual evaluation

70

Small group report (40%)
Research action (60%)

Group evaluation

30

Formal group presentation

Optional subject

Subjects are separately instructed by professor in study guide book?

Treatise

Treatise contents

70

Treatise schedule carefully observed
Process evaluation applied

Treatise presentation

30

Evaluation in various point of view : participation, exemplary words and deeds, initiative setting of an example, self-sacrifice, service etc. evaluation among students concerning leadership

Attendance : grade reduction penality for absence

Out of school activity evaluation : evaluation and considerations done by committee
Award System
Motivation to study through innovation in award system

Innovation in study atmosphere by guaranteeing objectification and lucency which are essential factors for award selection

Diversification in essential factors including application of multi-point-view evaluation individually and among students

Elevating the best military education status by newly establishing a governmental awarding system for outstanding personnel